1. Explain two of the conflicting arguments about “reading” Shelby Lee Adams’ photos presented by the people in the film. Include the names of the people who spoke about these interpretations. 5points.
The two most glaring conflicting arguments have to do with Shelby’s motives. He was raised in this poor Appalachian community, and after receiving an education he went back to document the struggles. John Bennete, an artist, had a positive opinion about the pictures because he said they highlighted squalor in its worst from in that area, white poverty. One of the residents Correia Zabler said that the pictures spoke the truth, they may not be pretty but they were real. The other side of the argument is that he has used his ‘insider’ status to document these people’s squalor for his own profit. The mayor of Hazzard said he thought the pictures were good because they made money. I missed his name but the critic wearing a vest with a yellow and magenta tie beneath along with sunglasses said he thought the pictures exploited because the subjects did not have the visual intelligence to see they were being photographed for Shelby’s pocketbook.
2. When pressed to speak about the social connotations of a photo featuring a little girl in a screen door, Shelby avoids answering the question directly by instead describing the formal composition of the photograph… Describe the photograph in your own words. 3points.
I thought that the sister of the subject was very harsh on Shelby and his motives. I liked that picture quite a bit. The subject in the foreground was a cute little girl receiving good lighting and great contrast from the wall/door she was leaning upon. The man in the background was in a comfortable position and you could tell their relation due to proximity and his body language. I agree that the picture made the two look impoverished, but the truth is not always pretty.
3. How do you interpret Shelby’s photos? why? 2points.
I think that they have very interesting lighting and depths of field. I also think that they are very similar to the Depression photos taken by FSA Photographers. All of the black and white, the family units, the glum looks on everyone’s faces all reminded me of those pictures from the 30’s. That is not all necessarily a bad thing. I think once you get past the exploitation issue or is he just copying other’s style, the reality in these pictures exists today. This country forgets often that not everything is posh like New York or Chicago, but the boonies sometimes can be a frightening place to live, economically.